Births per Woman vs. Health Spending per Person by Country

Countries with higher Health Spending per Person tend to have lower Births per Woman.

Very strong link: a correlation of −0.77 across 191 countries.CorrelationHow closely two metrics move together, from −1 to +1. Near +1: both rise together. Near −1: one rises as the other falls. Near 0: no clear link.More in the glossary →

246$100$1K$10KHealth Spending per Person (US$) (log scale)Births per WomanChadSomaliaSouth KoreaSingaporeLaos
Each dot is one place. The dashed line is the trend; circled places are named in the text.

Each dot in the chart is one of 191 countries. The correlation between Health Spending per Person (on a log scale) and Births per Woman is -0.77, a very strong relationship: about 60% of the differences in Births per Woman from place to place line up with Health Spending per Person. Ranked instead of measured, the link is -0.81.

The highest Births per Woman is in Chad (6.03), Somalia (6.01) and DR Congo (5.98); the lowest is in South Korea (0.75), Singapore (0.97) and Malta (1.01). The median place has 2.08 for Births per Woman and $470 for Health Spending per Person.

The biggest exceptions sit furthest from the trend line. Chad, Central African Republic and Niger have a much higher Births per Woman than their Health Spending per Person would predict, while Laos, Bhutan and Myanmar have a much lower one.

This is a comparison across places, not proof that one causes the other: both can follow from something else, such as income, age or how urban a place is. Health Spending per Person is from 2023 and Births per Woman from 2024.

Highest Births per Woman

PlaceBirths per WomanHealth Spending per Person
Chad6.03$47.44
Somalia6.01$22.37
DR Congo5.98$23.43
Central African Republic5.95$53.81
Niger5.94$26.01

Lowest Births per Woman

PlaceBirths per WomanHealth Spending per Person
South Korea0.75$3,044
Singapore0.97$3,922
Malta1.01$3,623
China1.01$763
Andorra1.09$3,605

Explore it yourself

More connections